fertilityPATH
ClinicsDoctorsTreatmentsResourcesWho we are
Ask PATH
← ClinicsIVF North East
Above average · HFEA Licensed

IVF North East

Stockton-on-Tees, UKHFEA: Above averagePart of London Women's Clinic, Darlington's HFEA licence
Live birth rate
45%
+7pp vs UK avg
Cycles 2016–18
1,072
Low volume
Blastocyst rate
82%
stronger lab when higher
Multiple birth
4%
lower is safer
Starting from
price not listed

Should I shortlist this clinic?

Above-average outcomes — strongest for under-35s.

Based on age-adjusted HFEA live-birth data (2016–18) vs the UK national average.

Good fit if
you're in the Under 35 age band — their strongest results
you're considering IVF, their best-performing treatment
Look closer if
outcomes for the 35-37 age band are below the national average
it's a lower-volume clinic — fewer cycles behind the figures
Questions to ask before booking
·What's included in the quoted price, and what add-on costs are typical?
·What were your live-birth rates for my age group in the latest HFEA data?
·How many cycles like mine do you carry out each year?
Ask PATH about this clinic

Your question about this clinic travels with you — after sign-up it's waiting as the start of your first PATH conversation.

About

Reviews referencing IVF North East paint a consistently positive picture of a small, patient-centered fertility service anchored by a visible and trusted lead clinician. Across multiple accounts patients emphasise very high overall satisfaction: reviewers repeatedly describe the care as compassionate, professional and personalised. Clinical contact is framed as close and continuous — many comment that appointments never felt rushed, that the consultant took time to listen and explain, and that the whole team provided clear step‑by‑step guidance through a technically and emotionally demanding pathway. Communication is a clear strength in these reports: patients note prompt access to their clinician (including direct contact and out‑of‑hours phone availability), plain‑spoken explanations of protocols and monitoring, and reassuring follow‑up contacts. That combination of technical clarity and interpersonal warmth is frequently cited as turning an otherwise stressful process into something manageable and hopeful. On clinical expertise and outcomes the tone is strongly positive. Multiple reviewers name the lead clinician (Dr/Mr Hany Mostafa) and attribute both technical competence and thoughtful decision‑making to him — one family explicitly credits his expertise with achieving a successful second cycle after an unsuccessful first attempt. The presence of a high‑grade frozen embryo is mentioned as an important clinical and emotional outcome, giving future options and security. Patients also describe careful monitoring during cycles and continuity of care before, during, and after treatment, which contributes to confidence in safety and clinical oversight. Emotional support and the softer aspects of care are prominent themes. Commenters emphasise empathy, reassurance, patience and a genuine sense of being heard and respected. Several reviews highlight that staff made space for questions and that no question felt too trivial; that responsiveness (including availability by phone) reduced anxiety associated with unpredictable fertility journeys. Administrative experience and wait times receive less detail but what is reported is generally favourable. Appointments are described as well organised and timely; no chronic administrative complaints are evident in these fertility‑specific comments. The only clear clinical hiccup reported is the common reality of an initial unsuccessful protocol, followed by a supported repeat attempt — a normal pattern in fertility care rather than a service failing. Recurring positive themes are personalised care, excellent clinician accessibility, empathetic staff, transparent communication and demonstrable clinical success. There are few negatives raised in the fertility excerpts, suggesting strong patient loyalty and high likelihood of recommendation and return for further treatment.

Treatments offered
Lab quality signals
82%
Blastocyst rate
Higher = stronger lab
56%
Elective single ET
eSET = ethical practice
4%
Multiple birth rate
Lower = safer outcomes

Questions people ask about IVF North East

Written in PATH's voice from this clinic's published HFEA data — reviewed before publishing, never generated live.

Is IVF North East a good fit for someone my age?

IVF North East's overall live-birth rate sits above the national average, at 45% per embryo transferred against a national average of 38%. Their under-35 group is where this shows most clearly, also running at 45% against 38% nationally. The 35-37 band is weaker, at 25% against a 32% national average, so it's worth asking specifically about your own age band rather than the headline number. This is a low-volume clinic, so smaller caseloads can swing more from year to year — worth asking how consistent that pattern has been over recent years.

What does IVF North East's success rate actually measure?

The figure is a live-birth rate per embryo transferred, taken from HFEA-verified regulated data covering 2016-2018. Before comparing this to another clinic's number, it's worth checking two things: whether their quoted rate is per embryo transferred or per cycle started (these can differ quite a bit), and which years the figure covers, since a clinic's performance can shift between reporting periods. Asking IVF North East directly for their most recent full-year figures alongside the HFEA data is a reasonable way to sense-check this.

What should I ask IVF North East before booking?

A few things worth raising directly with the team: - What's included in the quoted price, and what add-on costs are typical, since headline prices rarely cover everything - What their live-birth rates were for your specific age group in the latest HFEA data, rather than the clinic-wide figure - How many cycles like yours they carry out each year, given this is a lower-volume clinic. A good consultant will welcome these questions and answer them plainly rather than deflecting.

These answers use published data only — PATH personalizes once it knows your age, your numbers, and your story.

Get in Touch

Ready to start your journey? Contact the clinic directly.

Ask PATH if this clinic fits youRequest Consultation

Opens in the app — you'll create a free account first.

Compare Clinics

fertilityPATH earns no referral fees. We recommend clinics based on data, not commercial relationships.

Quick intel
Best age bandUnder 35
Total cycles1,072
Blastocyst rate82%
Elective single ET56%
Multiple birth rate4%
Bias firewall
This clinic has not paid for placement. Data from HFEA + patient reviews only.
© 2026 fertilityPATH. All rights reserved.Privacy·Terms·Cookies·Subprocessors·