ClinicsDoctorsTreatmentsResourcesWho we areAsk PATHBelow-average outcomes — strongest for under-35s.
Based on age-adjusted HFEA live-birth data (2016–18) vs the UK national average.
Your question about this clinic travels with you — after sign-up it's waiting as the start of your first PATH conversation.
Across the large and sometimes contradictory set of patient accounts, ABC IVF / Create Fertility at St Paul’s projects as a clinically capable, high-volume fertility provider whose strengths sit squarely with its medical and nursing teams but whose operational systems and communications create frequent friction. Many reviewers speak warmly and in detail about compassionate, skilled doctors, helpful embryologists and particularly supportive nurses and named patient coordinators (several individuals are singled out by name). Multiple success stories — pregnancies and babies born after single or multiple cycles — appear alongside praise for less-invasive protocols (natural/mild IVF) and for good quality egg‑freezing results. Staff in theatre, anaesthesia and embryology earn repeated commendations for technical competence and bedside manner, and the clinic’s mild/natural IVF approach is often appreciated by patients who want less medication and fewer side effects. Counterbalancing these clinical positives, a strong and recurrent theme is poor administration and inconsistent communication. Many patients report long call‑centre waits, delayed or missing replies to urgent queries, rotating patient coordinators, and confusion over prescriptions, consent forms, and critical timelines. These lapses have in some accounts led to missed cycle starts, missed medication windows, and substantial emotional strain. Financial transparency is another flashpoint: several reviewers describe opaque charging, surprise extra fees, disputed invoices, and slow or non‑existent refunds, including cases involving PGT‑A billing and charges for cycles that did not proceed. A handful of reports allege procedural or clinical oversights (e.g., tests not checked prior to fertilisation, PGT testing performed without clear consent, or inconsistent interpretation of scans), which in individual cases contributed to loss of confidence. Patient experience is therefore highly polarized. Many praise specific clinicians and nurses for kindness, explanation, and continuity during procedures, and credit the clinic for achieving desired outcomes; others describe feeling like “a number,” frustrated by automated or disjointed processes, and harmed by administrative errors. Emotional support is uneven: nursing and theatre teams are frequently lauded for empathy, while counselling and follow‑up after adverse outcomes are cited as lacking in some instances. Practical issues also surface — variable clinic environments across locations, travel burden for some procedures, and inconsistent access to a centralised patient portal or timely medical records. In summary, ABC IVF / Create Fertility demonstrates clear clinical strengths and a repeat pattern of excellent hands‑on care from doctors, nurses and embryologists; however systemic issues in administration, billing transparency, and communication create variability in the overall patient journey. Prospective patients who prioritise clinical expertise and the mild‑IVF model may find the clinic attractive, but should enter with explicit, written agreements on costs, clear written timelines for medication and consent, and proactive requests for direct contact with their care team to mitigate known operational risks.
Source: HFEA regulated data. Best age band: Under 35. Weakest: 35-37.
No cost details listed for this clinic. Contact the clinic directly for an indicative quote.
Patient-review insights for this clinic aren't ingested yet. The HFEA-regulated outcomes shown elsewhere on this page are the most reliable signal until then.
We don't yet have a verified consultant list for this clinic. Browse the full doctors directory for GMC-registered specialists.
Written in PATH's voice from this clinic's published HFEA data — reviewed before publishing, never generated live.
Worth looking at the detail rather than the headline alone. abc IVF, St Paul's reports its strongest results for patients under 35, at 57% against a national average of 37%. The 35-37 band, where you'd sit, comes in at 35% versus a national 31% — still slightly ahead of average, though its overall live-birth rate of 30% trails the 36% national figure. It's also a low-volume clinic, so smaller caseloads here can shift more from one year to the next than at a larger unit, which is worth weighing alongside the age-specific numbers.
It refers to a live-birth rate per embryo transferred, taken from HFEA-verified regulated data covering 2016 to 2018. That's a solid, independently checked foundation, but a couple of checks make comparison fairer. Ask whether a figure is per embryo transferred or per cycle started, since clinics can report either, and note which years any quoted rate actually spans. Two clinics can look similar at a glance while covering different periods, so it's worth confirming before comparing abc IVF, St Paul's against elsewhere.
A short, direct list tends to get the most useful answers. It's reasonable to ask abc IVF, St Paul's: - what's included in the quoted price, and what add-on costs typically appear - what their live-birth rates were for your age group in the latest HFEA data - how many cycles similar to yours they carry out each year. These questions aren't awkward to raise, and a good consultant will welcome them as part of an honest first conversation.
These answers use published data only — PATH personalizes once it knows your age, your numbers, and your story.
Ready to start your journey? Contact the clinic directly.
Ask PATH if this clinic fits youRequest ConsultationOpens in the app — you'll create a free account first.
Compare ClinicsfertilityPATH earns no referral fees. We recommend clinics based on data, not commercial relationships.
