ClinicsDoctorsTreatmentsResourcesWho we areAsk PATHBelow-average outcomes — strongest for under-35s.
Based on age-adjusted HFEA live-birth data (2016–18) vs the UK national average.
Your question about this clinic travels with you — after sign-up it's waiting as the start of your first PATH conversation.
CREATE Fertility Wimbledon presents as a small, personable clinic with a clear strength in hands-on nursing care and individual staff members who are deeply valued by patients. Across the reviews there is a recurring pattern: clinical staff — particularly named nurses and one consultant, Dr Nagi Rostom — receive warm praise for empathy, clear communication and technical competence. Several patients describe nurses who adjusted protocols responsively, provided daily follow-up calls after procedures, and delivered reassurance during complex experiences such as abdominal egg collection and ectopic pregnancy. These personal interactions create a calming, intimate atmosphere that many patients explicitly credit for helping them through emotionally taxing cycles and, in several cases, for contributing to successful pregnancies. Clinically, the centre appears competent with routine assisted reproduction pathways: patients report IVF and ICSI cycles, day-3 embryo transfers, egg collection procedures, and use of a “mild” stimulation protocol popular with people who have endometriosis/adenomyosis. For some patients the mild-protocol approach and the clinic’s technical execution produced excellent outcomes (including successful NHS-funded IVF/ICSI resulting in births). Abdominal egg collection was specifically described as straightforward and well-managed by the team, indicating confidence in procedural skill and perioperative care for more complex retrievals. However, the reviews consistently flag administrative and communication weaknesses. Several patients report fragmented administration: changing patient coordinators, no single regular point of contact, long telephone hold times (20–30 minutes), difficulty getting clear answers, and occasional hidden costs. These organisational issues appear to undermine patient confidence even when clinical care is strong. One reviewer felt the advertised success rates did not reflect the clinic’s demographic mix and warned that care appeared less tailored for unexplained infertility or medically complex cases; another worried that protocols were not sufficiently adapted when ovarian response differed from expectations. There is also at least one report of a consultant with poor bedside manner, a reminder that interpersonal experience can vary by clinician. Emotionally the clinic is seen as supportive largely because of the nursing team and some named doctors; patient coordinators elicit mixed feedback depending on continuity and responsiveness. Wait times for phone contact and administrative hand-offs are genuine pain points. Recurring themes are therefore: very positive, individualized nursing care and personable doctors; technically competent procedural work (egg retrievals, transfers, mild protocols); and inconsistent, sometimes poor administration and communication that can impact patient experience. For prospective patients, this clinic may suit those seeking a more intimate, nurse-led environment and mild stimulation approaches, but people with complex or unexplained infertility should clarify care pathways and administrative continuity upfront.
Source: HFEA regulated data. Best age band: Under 35. Weakest: 35-37.
No cost details listed for this clinic. Contact the clinic directly for an indicative quote.
Patient-review insights for this clinic aren't ingested yet. The HFEA-regulated outcomes shown elsewhere on this page are the most reliable signal until then.
We don't yet have a verified consultant list for this clinic. Browse the full doctors directory for GMC-registered specialists.
Written in PATH's voice from this clinic's published HFEA data — reviewed before publishing, never generated live.
Under 35 is CREATE Fertility, London Wimbledon's strongest age band, while 35-37 is where results currently sit closest to the national figure. The clinic's overall live-birth rate is 30%, against a national average of 36% — a below average result on HFEA's rating. It's also a low-volume clinic, so smaller caseloads can swing more from year to year than at a larger unit. Worth asking how consistent this performance has been recently.
It's a live-birth rate per embryo transferred, based on HFEA-verified regulated data covering 2016-18. Two checks are worth making before comparing it with another clinic's figure: whether it's per embryo transferred or per cycle started, since these aren't interchangeable, and which years the comparison figure covers, as clinics don't all report on the same cycle. A good clinic will confirm both points if you ask directly.
Worth raising: what's included in the quoted price, and what add-on costs are typical — medication, freezing and storage are common gaps; what were your live-birth rates for my age group in the latest HFEA data, rather than relying on the headline figure alone; and how many cycles like mine you carry out each year, since this is a low-volume clinic where numbers can move. A good consultant will welcome these questions.
These answers use published data only — PATH personalizes once it knows your age, your numbers, and your story.
Ready to start your journey? Contact the clinic directly.
Ask PATH if this clinic fits youRequest ConsultationOpens in the app — you'll create a free account first.
Compare ClinicsfertilityPATH earns no referral fees. We recommend clinics based on data, not commercial relationships.
