ClinicsDoctorsTreatmentsResourcesWho we areAsk PATHStrong outcomes — strongest for ages 35-37.
Based on age-adjusted HFEA live-birth data (2016–18) vs the UK national average.
Your question about this clinic travels with you — after sign-up it's waiting as the start of your first PATH conversation.
IVF London emerges as a fertility clinic with predominantly positive patient experiences, characterized by personalized care, compassionate staff, and high success rates in assisted reproduction. Numerous reviews highlight a warm, supportive environment where patients feel valued as individuals rather than case numbers. The clinic receives consistent praise for its attentive, knowledgeable staff across roles—receptionists, nurses, sonographers, embryologists, and doctors—with specific personnel like Dr. Sawant, Dr. Arati Rao, Alpesh (embryologist), Risham, Teena, and Sharon frequently commended for their professionalism, empathy, and responsiveness. Patients appreciate the clinic’s personalized treatment protocols, flexibility around busy schedules, and transparent communication, which helps ease the emotional burden of fertility journeys. Several success stories, including first-round IVF pregnancies, twin pregnancies, and pregnancies after failed cycles at other clinics, underscore the clinic’s clinical competence. The facility’s compact size, well-equipped 'under one roof' services (including parking), and extended support (e.g., 24/7 nurse accessibility, emergency appointments) enhance convenience. Cutting-edge science, transparency in costs, and a familial atmosphere differentiate IVF London from larger, more impersonal clinics. However, a small subset of reviews raises concerns. A notable complaint alleges an incorrect initial diagnosis leading to unnecessary hormonal treatments (e.g., Prostap) and £3,000 in unrefunded costs, later contradicted by a second opinion identifying fibroids requiring surgery. Additional grievances include billing disputes (e.g., partial refund refusal for a canceled scan), occasional communication gaps, and administrative errors, though several patients note these issues were resolved upon escalation. The clinic demonstrates responsiveness to feedback, with one reviewer acknowledging visible improvements over time. Stresses to improve clarity in scan follow-ups and documentation are noted. Overall, IVF London projects a strong reputation for clinical expertise—especially in IVF, hormonal protocols, and embryology—alongside outstanding patient-centered care, but maintaining diagnostic accuracy and administrative consistency remains critical for trust-building.
Source: HFEA regulated data. Best age band: 35-37. Weakest: 35-37.
No cost details listed for this clinic. Contact the clinic directly for an indicative quote.
Patient-review insights for this clinic aren't ingested yet. The HFEA-regulated outcomes shown elsewhere on this page are the most reliable signal until then.
We don't yet have a verified consultant list for this clinic. Browse the full doctors directory for GMC-registered specialists.
Written in PATH's voice from this clinic's published HFEA data — reviewed before publishing, never generated live.
IVF London's overall live-birth rate is 70%, well above the national average of 50%. The only age band with published detail is 35-37, where the clinic's rate of 38% sits above the national figure of 31% for that group. As a lower-volume clinic, it's worth asking directly how many patients in your age group they've treated recently, since smaller caseloads can vary more year to year, and a strong headline figure doesn't always tell you how it applies to your specific circumstances.
The headline number is a live-birth rate per embryo transferred, taken from HFEA-verified regulated data covering 2016-18. Two checks are worth making before comparing it with another clinic: whether a rate is per embryo transferred or per cycle started, as these give quite different-looking figures, and which years the data covers. IVF London should be able to walk through their own numbers on the same basis, which makes any comparison across clinics much clearer.
Sensible questions to bring: - What's included in the quoted price, and what add-on costs are typical? - What were your live-birth rates for my age group in the latest HFEA data? - How many cycles like mine do you carry out each year? A high headline rate is worth probing rather than taking at face value, particularly for your own age group. A good consultant will welcome that scrutiny and answer it directly.
These answers use published data only — PATH personalizes once it knows your age, your numbers, and your story.
Ready to start your journey? Contact the clinic directly.
Ask PATH if this clinic fits youRequest ConsultationOpens in the app — you'll create a free account first.
Compare ClinicsfertilityPATH earns no referral fees. We recommend clinics based on data, not commercial relationships.
