ClinicsDoctorsTreatmentsResourcesWho we areAsk PATHBelow-average outcomes — strongest for ages 40-42.
Based on age-adjusted HFEA live-birth data (2016–18) vs the UK national average.
Your question about this clinic travels with you — after sign-up it's waiting as the start of your first PATH conversation.
LUNA Clinic presents as a small, professionally run fertility and gynaecology practice that leaves a generally positive impression among patients, with a clear strength in clinical expertise and personal bedside manner. Reviewers consistently highlight the quality of the doctors: specific clinicians (Dr Baseel and Dr Sophie Clarke) are praised for being knowledgeable, kind, thorough and effective at explaining next steps. That clinical competence and compassion form the backbone of the clinic's reputation: patients repeatedly say they felt well cared for medically and emotionally during consultations about PCOS, fertility concerns and recurrent miscarriage. Those clinical interactions are described as reassuring and helpful, and several writers explicitly recommend the clinic to others who need more support than they receive from their GP. Staff attitude and front-line communication are mixed but generally favourable. Receptionists and administrative staff are repeatedly described as friendly, accommodating and effective at coordinating records (for example, chasing scans from another hospital). The clinic’s virtual appointment capability and online handling of paperwork are seen as convenient and smoothing the patient journey for people balancing work and other commitments. Reviewers appreciate the responsiveness and professionalism of the clinical team overall, and note that appointment scheduling is precise when it works well. Where the clinic falls short is in patient management and administrative follow-through. Multiple comments point to delays and lapses in administration: late virtual appointments, delays in issuing prescriptions and the need for patients to chase up medication or documents. For at least one patient this produced significant anxiety because a new medication dose was missed for several days. These operational problems are treated as distinct from clinical competence — reviewers identify the clinicians as excellent while describing the administrative processes as “sub par” or dropped. Emotional support during clinical encounters is highlighted as a strong point. Clinicians are described as empathetic and thorough, able to discuss sensitive issues such as miscarriage and PCOS with clarity and care. That combination of clinical knowledge and warmth is a recurring positive theme and a likely driver of the high recommendations. Outcomes are not reported in detail in these reviews — there are no explicit mentions of pregnancy rates, IVF cycles, or embryology outcomes — but reviewers do cite useful clinical guidance and effective management of fertility-related conditions. The main recurring themes are: strong doctor-patient rapport and expertise; convenient virtual services and effective scheduling when systems work; friendly reception staff; and inconsistent administrative execution around prescriptions and timely communication. Overall, LUNA Clinic reads as clinically strong and patient-centred, with operational improvements in administration and prescription handling needed to match the high standard set by its clinicians.
Source: HFEA regulated data. Best age band: 40-42. Weakest: Under 35.
No cost details listed for this clinic. Contact the clinic directly for an indicative quote.
Patient-review insights for this clinic aren't ingested yet. The HFEA-regulated outcomes shown elsewhere on this page are the most reliable signal until then.
We don't yet have a verified consultant list for this clinic. Browse the full doctors directory for GMC-registered specialists.
Written in PATH's voice from this clinic's published HFEA data — reviewed before publishing, never generated live.
It depends where you sit in the age bands HFEA reports. LUNA Clinic's headline live birth rate is 23%, below the national average of 31%. Their strongest results are in the 40-42 group (17% versus 18% nationally), while under-35s sit furthest behind (31% versus 38%). Overall this clinic sits in the below average HFEA tier. It's worth asking LUNA Clinic directly how their under-35 results compare with other clinics near you, and what's changed since the reporting period, before ruling anything in or out.
The headline figure is the live birth rate per embryo transferred, from HFEA-verified regulated data covering 2016 to 2018 — a population statistic across many patients, not a forecast for any individual person. Two things worth checking before comparing clinics: whether a quoted rate is per embryo transferred or per cycle started (these can look very different), and which years the figure covers, since practice and lab technique change over time. Asking a clinic to state both clearly is a reasonable, fair question, and a transparent one will answer it plainly.
A few starting points worth raising directly with LUNA Clinic: - What's included in the quoted price, and what add-on costs are typical? - What were your live-birth rates for my age group in the latest HFEA data? Given LUNA Clinic runs a medium volume of cycles, it's also fair to ask how much their yearly figures move up or down year to year, since caseloads at this size can vary more than very high-volume clinics. A good consultant will welcome these questions rather than brushing past them.
These answers use published data only — PATH personalizes once it knows your age, your numbers, and your story.
Ready to start your journey? Contact the clinic directly.
Ask PATH if this clinic fits youRequest ConsultationOpens in the app — you'll create a free account first.
Compare ClinicsfertilityPATH earns no referral fees. We recommend clinics based on data, not commercial relationships.
