ClinicsDoctorsTreatmentsResourcesWho we areAsk PATHAverage outcomes — strongest for under-35s.
Based on age-adjusted HFEA live-birth data (2016–18) vs the UK national average.
Your question about this clinic travels with you — after sign-up it's waiting as the start of your first PATH conversation.
Miss Sara Mathews' clinic presents as a highly trusted, patient-centred fertility practice where clinical competence and compassionate care are tightly interwoven. Across the reviews there is a consistent tone of strong overall satisfaction: patients describe excellent clinical outcomes, explicitly credit the clinician with problem-solving abilities that went beyond standard pathways, and repeatedly recommend the service without reservation. The clinic projects an image of individualized medicine — reviewers emphasize that care plans were tailored to specific circumstances rather than defaulting to a single protocol. One reviewer highlights that the clinician devised multiple contingency plans (A, B and C), which reinforced confidence in the clinical reasoning and planning behind each step. Outcomes are described as "top results" and "really good," indicating successful procedural and laboratory work as interpreted by the patients. Staff attitude and communication are recurrent strengths in the reviews. The lead clinician is described as knowledgeable, kind and reassuring; descriptors such as "brilliant," "personable," and "divine feminine energy" point to a bedside manner that makes patients feel held and at ease. The named team members, Lucy and Sarah, are singled out for responsiveness and efficiency. Multiple comments note that the team is quick to answer questions, that medical advice is readily available at all times, and that the administrative and nursing interactions helped make the experience "seamless." One patient also commented that cost felt reasonable for the quality of care, which suggests value-for-money in addition to a positive service experience. Clinical expertise is presented as a major differentiator. Reviewers perceive the lead as an expert fertility specialist who takes a nuanced approach — identifying root causes, offering alternatives to default IVF, and tailoring protocols to individual needs. This hands-on, analytical approach appears to have contributed to both the emotional reassurance patients report and the favorable clinical outcomes they experienced. Emotional support and patient experience are highlighted repeatedly. Patients describe being "looked after with more than just medicine," feeling peace and control over family planning timelines, and appreciating kindness, honesty and consideration throughout the journey. These comments indicate that psychological safety and empathetic communication are embedded in the clinic culture. Administrative and operational aspects are positively framed: responsiveness, clear explanations, and organisation are mentioned multiple times. There are no sustained complaints about wait times or scheduling in the sample; rather, the administrative team is praised for making processes well organised and timely. The only notable limitation of the data is its uniformly positive tone — the reviews form a strongly favourable, possibly self-selecting sample — but within that sample the recurring themes are clear: expert, personalised clinical care delivered by a kind, responsive team that supports both clinical and emotional needs.
Source: HFEA regulated data. Best age band: Under 35. Weakest: 40-42.
No cost details listed for this clinic. Contact the clinic directly for an indicative quote.
Patient-review insights for this clinic aren't ingested yet. The HFEA-regulated outcomes shown elsewhere on this page are the most reliable signal until then.
We don't yet have a verified consultant list for this clinic. Browse the full doctors directory for GMC-registered specialists.
Written in PATH's voice from this clinic's published HFEA data — reviewed before publishing, never generated live.
The overall live birth rate reported for Miss Sara Mathews is 33%, just above the national average of 31%, placing it in the average HFEA tier. Under-35 patients see the strongest results, at 45% versus a national 38%, while the 40-42 band is furthest behind, at 7% against 18% nationally. Because this is a low volume practice, figures can shift more from year to year than at high-volume clinics, so it's fair to ask directly how stable your specific age band's numbers have been.
It's the live birth rate per embryo transferred, sourced from HFEA-verified regulated data covering 2016 to 2018, describing outcomes across many patients rather than predicting any one result. Before comparing this figure to another clinic's, two checks are worth making: whether both are quoted per embryo transferred or per cycle started, since the two aren't interchangeable, and which years each figure spans. A practice confident in its numbers will happily clarify both points with you.
Useful starting points to raise directly: - What's included in the quoted price, and what add-on costs are typical? - What were your live-birth rates for my age group in the latest HFEA data? - How many cycles like mine do you carry out each year? Given this is a low volume practice, that last question helps put the headline rate in context. A good consultant will welcome these questions and give you straightforward answers.
These answers use published data only — PATH personalizes once it knows your age, your numbers, and your story.
Ready to start your journey? Contact the clinic directly.
Ask PATH if this clinic fits youRequest ConsultationOpens in the app — you'll create a free account first.
Compare ClinicsfertilityPATH earns no referral fees. We recommend clinics based on data, not commercial relationships.
