fertilityPATH
ClinicsDoctorsTreatmentsResourcesWho we are
Ask PATH
← ClinicsLister Fertility Clinic at The Portland Hospital
Average · HFEA Licensed

Lister Fertility Clinic at The Portland Hospital

London, United KingdomHFEA: Average
Live birth rate
39%
+2pp vs UK avg
Cycles 2016–18
1,579
Low volume
Blastocyst rate
60%
stronger lab when higher
Multiple birth
2%
lower is safer
Starting from
price not listed

Should I shortlist this clinic?

Average outcomes — strongest for ages 35-37.

Based on age-adjusted HFEA live-birth data (2016–18) vs the UK national average.

Good fit if
you're in the 35-37 age band — their strongest results
you're considering PGT-A, their best-performing treatment
Look closer if
outcomes for the 38-39 age band are below the national average
it's a lower-volume clinic — fewer cycles behind the figures
Questions to ask before booking
·What's included in the quoted price, and what add-on costs are typical?
·What were your live-birth rates for my age group in the latest HFEA data?
·How many cycles like mine do you carry out each year?
Ask PATH about this clinic

Your question about this clinic travels with you — after sign-up it's waiting as the start of your first PATH conversation.

About

Lister Fertility Clinic at The Portland Hospital is portrayed by patient reviews as a clinic offering compassionate, personalized care within a warm and supportive setting. The clinic receives consistent praise for its friendly, attentive, and professional staff, including doctors, nurses, embryologists, and administrative personnel. The environment is noted as 'intimate,' 'safe,' and 'welcoming,' with many patients feeling they were treated as individuals rather than numbers. Key strengths highlighted include the clinical team’s responsiveness during active treatment phases, thorough guidance on medication administration, and the genuine care exhibited during critical procedures like egg collection and embryo transfers. Several reviewers specifically commend consultants Dr. Salim and Dr. D'Argent for their clinical expertise, personalized approach, and long-term commitment to patient success. Dr. Salim, in particular, is celebrated for his pragmatic and reassuring demeanor, holistic treatment planning (e.g., mitigating OHSS risks), and exceptional follow-up care, including phone consultations during non-working hours. The embryology team earns praise for providing detailed, frequent updates on embryo development and their willingness to answer questions. The clinic’s efficient operations are reflected in short wait times, clean facilities, and smooth scheduling during treatments. However, administrative challenges arise outside the active treatment phase. Patients report initial delays in communication, inconsistent information from junior staff versus doctors, and frustrations in financial transparency—notably unexpected medication costs and confusion around payment processes. Phone accessibility is a recurring issue, though email responsiveness improves once treatment begins. Operational inconsistencies are also evident in care coordination. Reviewers note variability in nursing experiences, including occasional lapses in communication of critical information (e.g., allergies). While most nurses are described as patient, knowledgeable, and supportive, the lack of a consistent point of contact is a drawback for some. The clinic’s pharmacy services, operated by the broader hospital, attract criticism for long wait times. The emotional aspect of care is a double-edged sword. While staff are generally lauded for their empathy, delivering sensitive news (e.g., unsuccessful egg collection) via unfamiliar personnel is cited as impersonal and distressing. This contrasts sharply with the otherwise strong interpersonal connections formed with the clinical team. Discrepancies in financial administration, particularly for insured patients, further mar an otherwise positive experience. Despite these issues, the clinic’s high success rates, technical proficiency in treatments like IVF and embryo freezing, and the genuine dedication of its staff inspire strong loyalty. Many patients attribute their successful pregnancies to the clinic after years of unsuccessful attempts elsewhere. The supportive environment, combined with clinical excellence in reproductive endocrinology and embryology, makes Lister Fertility Clinic a highly recommended option, albeit one with room for improvements in administrative efficiency and care continuity.

Treatments offered
Lab quality signals
60%
Blastocyst rate
Higher = stronger lab
71%
Elective single ET
eSET = ethical practice
2%
Multiple birth rate
Lower = safer outcomes

Questions people ask about Lister Fertility Clinic at The Portland Hospital

Written in PATH's voice from this clinic's published HFEA data — reviewed before publishing, never generated live.

Is Lister Fertility Clinic at The Portland Hospital a good fit for my age group?

Lister Fertility Clinic at The Portland Hospital sits in the average HFEA tier, with a live-birth rate of 39% against a national average of 37% - a small edge of two percentage points. Its strongest results are in the 35-37 band, and its weakest in the 38-39 band, so where you fall in that range is worth asking about directly. This is a low-volume clinic, so smaller caseloads here can swing year to year - treat any single year's figures as one data point rather than a fixed prediction.

What does Lister Fertility Clinic's success rate at The Portland Hospital actually mean?

The headline figure is a live-birth rate per embryo transferred, drawn from HFEA-verified regulated data covering 2016 to 2018. It describes outcomes across many patients treated there in that period, not a forecast for any one person. Before comparing this clinic with another, it is worth checking two things: whether both figures are per embryo transferred or per cycle started (these are not interchangeable), and which years each quoted rate actually covers, since practices and results shift over time.

What should I ask Lister Fertility Clinic at The Portland Hospital before booking?

A few questions worth putting to them directly - what's included in the quoted price and what add-on costs tend to come up; what their live-birth rates were for your specific age group in the latest HFEA data, since clinic-wide figures can mask real variation by band; and how many cycles similar to yours they carry out each year, which speaks to how much recent experience they have with cases like yours. A good consultant will welcome these questions rather than brush past them.

These answers use published data only — PATH personalizes once it knows your age, your numbers, and your story.

Get in Touch

Ready to start your journey? Contact the clinic directly.

Ask PATH if this clinic fits youRequest Consultation

Opens in the app — you'll create a free account first.

Compare Clinics

fertilityPATH earns no referral fees. We recommend clinics based on data, not commercial relationships.

Quick intel
Best age band35-37
Total cycles1,579
Blastocyst rate60%
Elective single ET71%
Multiple birth rate2%
Bias firewall
This clinic has not paid for placement. Data from HFEA + patient reviews only.
© 2026 fertilityPATH. All rights reserved.Privacy·Terms·Cookies·Subprocessors·