ClinicsDoctorsTreatmentsResourcesWho we areAsk PATHAverage outcomes — strongest for under-35s.
Based on age-adjusted HFEA live-birth data (2016–18) vs the UK national average.
Your question about this clinic travels with you — after sign-up it's waiting as the start of your first PATH conversation.
The Shropshire and Mid-Wales Fertility Centre presents a mixed patient experience with notable strengths in certain clinical support areas but significant challenges in communication, inclusivity, and consistency of care. Reviews highlight that the clinic's embryologists and administrative staff are frequently praised for their expertise, kindness, and responsiveness, particularly in providing detailed explanations about embryo grading, freezing, and thawing processes. Patients appreciate having direct access to scientists (embryologists) for embryo-related questions and an emergency contact system, which provides reassurance, especially post-egg collection where risks like Ovarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome (OHSS) require vigilant monitoring. NHS-funded patients reported positive interactions with doctors, describing them as attentive and willing to listen, though some noted that in-person consultations with doctors were rare, with most communication occurring over the phone. The embryology team is repeatedly commended for going 'above and beyond,' contributing to a sense of technical competence in laboratory and cryopreservation services. However, nursing staff receive inconsistent feedback; while specific nurses (e.g., Emma and Ffion) are lauded as excellent, broader communication with nurses is described as 'dreadful,' with frequent delays in returned calls—often at inconvenient times like 4:30 PM on Fridays—leaving patients frustrated and without recourse until the following week. This inconsistency extended to care coordination, with at least one incident where a nurse had to intervene to halt a treatment plan that a doctor had nearly advanced despite patient concerns, raising questions about internal oversight. Communication challenges are a recurring theme, with patients citing difficulty reaching staff, inflexible scheduling leading to treatment delays, and a lack of inclusivity for same-sex couples, who reported feeling marginalized and noted limited engagement with doctors across multiple treatment rounds. The clinic environment itself is described as 'cold and clinical,' potentially adding to the stress of an already emotionally taxing process. While emergency support and embryology expertise are strengths, the clinic faces clear operational issues, including fragmented communication, insufficient doctor-patient engagement, and a need for greater cultural sensitivity. Some patients were so dissatisfied that they transferred care elsewhere, and one review called for an independent review of the clinic's practices. Overall, the clinic appears competent in technical and emergency aspects of fertility treatment but falls short in patient-centered communication, accessibility, and holistic support, particularly for marginalized groups.
Source: HFEA regulated data. Best age band: Under 35. Weakest: 35-37.
No cost details listed for this clinic. Contact the clinic directly for an indicative quote.
Patient-review insights for this clinic aren't ingested yet. The HFEA-regulated outcomes shown elsewhere on this page are the most reliable signal until then.
We don't yet have a verified consultant list for this clinic. Browse the full doctors directory for GMC-registered specialists.
Written in PATH's voice from this clinic's published HFEA data — reviewed before publishing, never generated live.
Shropshire and Mid-Wales Fertility Centre sits in the average HFEA tier, with a 27% birth rate against a 29% national average. Its strongest age band is under-35, at 35% against a national 38%, while the 35-37, 38-39 and 40-42 bands are all recorded at 0% against national averages of 32%, 26% and 17% respectively. With 1,077 cycles, this is a low-volume clinic, so it's worth asking how these particular age-band figures have moved over recent years before drawing conclusions from a single snapshot.
The headline number is a live-birth rate per embryo transferred, based on HFEA-verified regulated data from 2016 to 2018. It reflects outcomes across a population of patients treated in that window, not a prediction for any individual. Two checks are worth making before comparing clinics: confirm whether a quoted figure is per embryo transferred or per cycle started, since these measure different things, and check which years the data covers, as clinics can change practice between reporting periods.
A few things worth putting to them directly: - What's included in the quoted price, and what add-on costs are typical? - What were your live-birth rates for my age group in the latest HFEA data, especially given some bands show no recorded births? - How many cycles like mine do you carry out each year? A good consultant should welcome these questions and talk you through the honest picture rather than just the headline.
These answers use published data only — PATH personalizes once it knows your age, your numbers, and your story.
Ready to start your journey? Contact the clinic directly.
Ask PATH if this clinic fits youRequest ConsultationOpens in the app — you'll create a free account first.
Compare ClinicsfertilityPATH earns no referral fees. We recommend clinics based on data, not commercial relationships.
