ClinicsDoctorsTreatmentsResourcesWho we areAsk PATHStrong outcomes — strongest for under-35s.
Based on age-adjusted HFEA live-birth data (2016–18) vs the UK national average.
Your question about this clinic travels with you — after sign-up it's waiting as the start of your first PATH conversation.
CRGH clinic receives overwhelmingly negative reviews highlighting systemic organizational failures, inconsistent medical care, and poor patient experiences. Patients report long-standing communication breakdowns across departments (medical, finance, admin), intrusive billing practices with aggressive debt recovery for minor sums despite large payments made, and chaotic appointment management causing wasted time. Clinical concerns include outdated protocols using 'cookie-cutter' IVF approaches regardless of individual patient factors (e.g., failing to adjust protocols for diminished ovarian reserve), improper medication management (incorrect dosing/prescriptions resulting in ER visits), and lack of post-treatment follow-up. Multiple reviewers experienced technical failures—especially with patient portals preventing access to medical records/messages—with unresolved issues persisting for months. The clinic is accused of prioritizing profit through unnecessary upselling (particularly PGT testing with disputed medical necessity, overpriced drugs), while showing disregard for patient safety (failing to perform basic tests before prescribing high-risk medications like blood thinners, leading to miscarriage). The embryology lab competency is questioned due to low egg survival rates post-thaw (3/15 vs. claimed 95%). Despite some patients noting polite front-desk staff and nurses, clinical teams (especially consultants) are described as dismissive, unaccountable for errors, and lacking compassion—with one consultant becoming angry when patients declined PGT testing. Transfer of confidential documents/plans to wrong patients, chaotic prescription management, inadequate fertility investigations (basic sperm/womb issues missed until treated abroad), and refusal to acknowledge mistakes further undermine trust. HFEA success rates are seen as misleadingly outdated. Overall, CRGH is depicted as profit-driven with substandard clinical governance, administrative negligence, and emotionally traumatic patient journeys demanding careful consideration by prospective patients.
Source: HFEA regulated data. Best age band: Under 35. Weakest: 38-39.
No cost details listed for this clinic. Contact the clinic directly for an indicative quote.
Patient-review insights for this clinic aren't ingested yet. The HFEA-regulated outcomes shown elsewhere on this page are the most reliable signal until then.
We don't yet have a verified consultant list for this clinic. Browse the full doctors directory for GMC-registered specialists.
Written in PATH's voice from this clinic's published HFEA data — reviewed before publishing, never generated live.
CRGH Portland's HFEA data shows a strong 49% live-birth rate per embryo transferred, against a 36% national average — well above the national picture. Under 35 was their best-performing band (64% versus 38% nationally), while 38-39 was notably lower (3% versus 26%), so the picture varies a good deal by age. This is a low-volume clinic, meaning results can shift more year to year than at larger units, even with an overall strong figure. Asking them for your specific age band's current numbers is a sensible step regardless of the headline rate.
The 49% figure is the live-birth rate per embryo transferred, drawn from HFEA-verified regulated data covering 2016-18 — a population statistic, not a personal prediction. Two checks worth making before comparing clinics: whether a rate is quoted per embryo transferred or per cycle started, as these differ, and which years the data spans. Given how much this clinic's results vary between age bands, it's worth asking them to talk through your specific group's figures rather than relying on the overall headline number.
Consider asking: what's included in the quoted price and what add-on costs are typical, what their live-birth rates were for your age group in the latest HFEA data, and how many cycles like yours they carry out each year, since this is a low-volume clinic despite the strong headline figure. Whatever else matters to your own situation is worth raising too. A good consultant will welcome these questions and answer them properly.
These answers use published data only — PATH personalizes once it knows your age, your numbers, and your story.
Ready to start your journey? Contact the clinic directly.
Ask PATH if this clinic fits youRequest ConsultationOpens in the app — you'll create a free account first.
Compare ClinicsfertilityPATH earns no referral fees. We recommend clinics based on data, not commercial relationships.
